unimus.net

Beats 27%.

of 1,663 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

unimus.net desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Something wrong?

Scanned 2026-11-02SaaS

Below the fold

Section by section.

Each part of the page, with our check beside it.

  1. unimus.net Hero section
    Hero · their words: “Network Automation”
    Hero · 0% to 38% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 4 buttons and links, “Get started using Unimus” and “1”, 49 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  2. unimus.net Content section
    Content · their words: “Want to see everything Unimus can do?”
    Content · 38% to 53% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 1 button or link, “Explore features”, 19 words. Absent, not scored 0.

Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-02. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.

Something wrong?

What sets it apart

unimus.net does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,657 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Lead-capture form

    Rarity

    Only 29%.

    of 1,657 SaaS funnels have lead-capture form. This site is one of them.

    29 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 71 wait outside.

    475 of 1657 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    unimus.net Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where unimus.net does it · Homepage / Lander: “EMAIL, b_1686fec5ab31fd0e5cc557d54_ef78f58d6b, subscribe”

    FOUND. Only 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. unimus.net does. 475 of 1657 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

unimus.net misses 2 things most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 27%.

of 1,663 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 27% of 1663 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Network Automation”

  • About Unimus
  • Cybersecurity & NIS2
  • Resources
  • My account
  • Get started using Unimus
  • Explore features
  • Subscribe
  • Download

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 10 pass · 5 need work · 9 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.75×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 6 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (87 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Inline validation

4 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Line length

1 paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Heading structure

The landing page has 6 <h1> elements (expected 1).

Note

Heading levels

3 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Render-blocking resources

5 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Note

Oversized images

4 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Note

Landmark regions

No <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Note

Keyboard reachability

31 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Note

Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 12 fields. browsers cannot autofill.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

92% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Form labels

4 of 8 form fields have no label (+4 rely on placeholder only).

Needs work

Named controls

21 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

45 of 105 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 2.0 MB across 63 measurable resources, but 121 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of unimus.net where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • unimus.net FAQ section, Pricing.Html
      FAQ · Pricing.Html

How it looks

Roboto for headlines and text. 6 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Lead-capture form: Only 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. unimus.net does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

4 of 11 selling tactics found: Lead-capture form, Demo / docs entry, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 7 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 7 it lacks
    • Trusted-by logo wall79% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. unimus.net doesn't. Gap
    • Pricing tiers52% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. unimus.net doesn't. Gap
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 4 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 8 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 7

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 6 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 8 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-02, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 30 links on the entry page, all walkable. 3 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · unimus.net · Compare

← Back to the unimus.net report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to unimus.net?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

unimus.net

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.