saas · Oct 18, 2026

bazicalculator.pro

We found more conversion tactics here than on 10% of the 1,450 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

3 conversion tactics detected

4 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.30.0

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 4

How this was measured

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.30.0 on 2026-10-18, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

  1. Links on the entry page139 links
  2. Walkable, same site105 links
  3. Matched a funnel step3 links
  4. Pages captured, entry page included4 pages

What we found

3 of 11 applicable

bazicalculator.pro shows 3 of the 11 tactics that apply to a SaaS funnel, and we did not see the other 8.

Proven on the page · 3

Compares itself against alternatives comparison table: Aspect · By hand · This calculator
Answers buyer objections Do I need an account? +
Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim logos: Powered by Startup Fast, Listed on Turbo0, Listed on ToolRain, NavFolders

Not seen on any step reached · 8

Free trial / freemium 1,411 of the 1,789 SaaS funnels we checked
Pricing tiers 914 of the 1,789 SaaS funnels we checked
Press / "as seen in" 655 of the 2,583 funnels we checked
Demo / docs entry 605 of the 1,799 funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 472 of the 1,799 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 419 of the 2,586 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 299 of the 2,196 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 135 of the 2,583 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Put these tactics to workBrief your AIX-ray your funnel

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

We walked 4 pages. Homepage / Lander runs the most named tactics (5), and 2 pages run none.

Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

5 tactics · most on this funnel
ComparisonCountdownSubscriptionFAQLogo wall

Pricing
02

Pricing

1 tactic

$0

FAQ

Compare
03

Compare

0 tactics

no named tactics detected on this step

Auth
04

Auth

0 tactics · fewest on this funnel

no named tactics detected on this step

Also captured on mobile, 4 steps.

In their own words

31 quoted

Their headline: “Free BaZi Calculator”

Their description: “Free BaZi calculator: Four Pillars, Day Master, Ten Gods, Five Elements and Luck Pillars with true solar time. Plus Zi Wei Dou Shu, Liu Yao, Mei Hua, Qi Men and the Chinese Almanac.”

All 31 quoted strings: title, description, headings and buttons
Page title
Free BaZi Calculator – Four Pillars of Destiny Chart | BaZi Calculator
Meta description
Free BaZi calculator: Four Pillars, Day Master, Ten Gods, Five Elements and Luck Pillars with true solar time. Plus Zi Wei Dou Shu, Liu Yao, Mei Hua, Qi Men and the Chinese Almanac.
Headline
Free BaZi Calculator
Section headings
Enter your birth detailsComplete Four Pillars chart with solar alignmentWhat BaZi is, and why precision mattersWhat your chart includesHow to calculate your BaZi chartExample chartHow we calculateMore calculators+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links
ToolsLearnLog inToggle modeSwitch languageGregorianChinese LunarCity not listed? Enter time zone and coordinates manuallyCalculate My ChartPlay the chart overview video.+2 more, not shown
Borrow the wordingBrief your AI

Sections

4 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

Nav section of bazicalculator.pro
Nav0% down the page
Comparison section of bazicalculator.pro
Comparison54% down the page
FAQ section of bazicalculator.pro
FAQ92% down the page
Footer section of bazicalculator.pro
Footer96% down the page

How well it’s built

16 run · 6 flagged

6 of 15 measured checks need work, and each comes with its fix

1 could not be measured, not counted either way

  • 6 Need work
  • 5 Worth knowing
  • 4 Clear
  • 1 Not measurable
  • Text contrast (WCAG AA)

    92% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 28% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

    worst: “Earth” at 3.53:1 (12px, #a07a2c on #f3f2f1). needs 4.5:1

    Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

    What this measures
  • Body text size

    Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

    Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

    What this measures
  • Line height

    Body line-height is 1.08×, tight enough to hurt readability.

    Set body line-height to ~1.4-1.6×.

    What this measures
  • Named controls

    1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

    Add aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.

    What this measures
  • Landmark regions

    No <header> or <main> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

    Wrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).

    What this measures
  • Tap-target size (mobile)

    110 of 277 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

    smallest: “Toggle Mobile Menu” at 32×32px

    Give tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

    What this measures
5 worth knowing, 4 clear, 1 not measurable

Worth knowing5

  • Line length

    55 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

    Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

    What this measures
  • Label in name

    1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

    Make the accessible name start with the visible label text.

    What this measures
  • Render-blocking resources

    6 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

    Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

    What this measures
  • Oversized images

    3 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

    “f-b_690x151_crop_center.png” is 300px wide, displayed at 108px

    Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

    What this measures
  • Keyboard reachability

    16 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

    “+”, “+”, “+”

    Use <button>/<a>, or add role + tabindex="0" and a key handler.

    What this measures

Clear4

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Inline validation

Not measurable1

  • Page weight

    At least 0.9 MB across 238 measurable resources, but 116 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Hand the 6 fixes to your build agentBrief your AI

Brand kit

5 colour roles

Their primary colour is #1d8a8a, on a #ffffff background with text in #6b6660.

  • primary#1d8a8a
  • accent#1d8a8a
  • bg#ffffff
  • surface#fbfaf9
  • text#6b6660
See the roles applied and the type scale
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
SIZE SCALE
10pxAa
11pxAa
12pxAa
13pxAa
14pxAa
15pxAa
16pxAa
17pxAa
18pxAa
19pxAa
20pxAa
34pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
FAMILIES
Noto Sans · ui-monospace
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled
Take their look into your buildDownload design tokens

We also ran these layers on the pages we captured and found nothing to show: Elements, Playbook match (2 of 9 layers). That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation, and a layer we never ran is not listed.

Go further

Compare with the corpus

Measured ranges for the parts of a page, from the funnels we have x-rayed.

Take this report with you

The same measurements, in formats a build agent can read.

Similar crawls