saas · Aug 15, 2026

emailverify.ai

75/100 Strong

Scores above 87% of 1,252 multi-step funnels we have measured. Among the 959 saas funnels in that group, above 84%.

6/11 tactics
3 steps
12 checks
5 flagged

How this was measured

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel.

Measured by Roentgen 1.25.1, one of our versioned rulesets. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Walk 114 links seen, 91 walkable, 2 matched, and we walked 3 pages.

Scan

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 3

What we recorded

Progress

3 scans

this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans

measured

-10pts since the first measured scan (2026-08-09) — 3 re-scans

85 Strong 2026-08-09
→
85 Strong 2026-08-12
→
75 Strong 2026-08-15

The funnel, frame by frame

3 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

▼ thinnest

7 tactics

$0.00014

Sticky CTASubscriptionFree trialNo cardLogo wallUsage proofDemo / docs

Pricing

▲ strongest

9 tactics

$20 +7 more · Save 20% · 1 proof point

Sticky CTASubscriptionFAQFree trialNo cardLogo wallUsage proofPricing tiersDemo / docs

Features

9 tactics

$0.00014

Sticky CTASubscriptionFAQTrust badgesFree trialNo cardLogo wallUsage proofDemo / docs

In their own words

22 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: Email Verification Tool & Bulk Email Checker | BillionVerify
Meta description: The email verification tool built for scale. Real-time SMTP checks, bulk list cleaning, and API with 99.9% accuracy. 100 free checks daily, no signup.
Headline: Verify Billions of Emails. At 1% the Cost.
Section headings: Built to understand every business, for real email deliverability insight, with realtime SMTP verification.How does BillionVerify verify email addresses?What evidence supports BillionVerify's verification claims?Which tools integrate with BillionVerify?What Our Customers SayBuild AI Workflows on Clean DataCheck Every AddressClean Every List+6 more, not shown
Buttons and links: Product🇺🇸 EnglishGet Started for FreeStart Verifying Now
Prices on the page: $0.00014

Sections

3 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Nav section of emailverify.ai — **Nav**1% down the page

Hero section of emailverify.ai — **Hero**2% down the page

Footer section of emailverify.ai — **Footer**92% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measured

Rating element — **Rating**“Trustpilot — Review BillionVerify. Earn verification credits.”

What we found

6 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

Offer clarity1 of 1

Makes the pricing ladder explicit free, $28/mo

Action path2 of 4

Offers a free trial or free tier free tier

Offers a demo or docs entry point documentation

Trust & proof2 of 2

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim trusted by

Puts a number on adoption 10,000+ businesses

Friction reduction2 of 2

Answers buyer objections 1. How does email verification pricing work?

Offers a free trial or free tier free tier

Value reinforcement1 of 2

Puts a number on adoption 10,000+ businesses

What we didn’t find

5 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see5 of 11 applicable

Press / "as seen in" 448 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Lead-capture form 310 of 1256 measured funnels run this

Us-vs-them comparison 304 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Proof above the fold 292 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Scarcity / urgency copy 94 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

12 run · 5 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

Readability & contrast1 flagged

Text contrast (WCAG AA) needs workcontrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

9% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 76% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “Get Started” at 1:1 (14px, #ffffff on #ffffff). needs 4.5:1

fix Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targetsclear

Mobile viewport passesmobile:mobile-viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography1 flagged

Body text size needs worktype:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 12px (base ~14px). below the ~16px readable floor.

fix Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Line length notetype:line-length

19 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

fix Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene1 flagged

Weight & delivery2 flagged

Page weight not measurableweight:page-weight

At least 2.6 MB across 164 measurable resources, but 164 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Render-blocking resources needs workweight:render-blocking-resources

16 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

fix Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

Oversized images needs workweight:oversized-images

16 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“verificaiton-result-distribution.webp” is 1054px wide, displayed at 461px

fix Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.