logo.dev
Beats 72%.
You beat 72%.
of 1,684 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
Below the fold
Section by section.
Each part of the page, with our check beside it.
No crop
This section is only 2% of the page, too thin to show without cutting in the one next to it.
Hero · 5% to 7% down the pageOur check
Not detectedNothing detected in this section.
No tactic located here. Measured: 16 words. Absent, not scored 0.
No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Pricing · their words: “Community” Pricing · 9% to 21% down the pageOur check
Not detectedNothing detected in this section.
No tactic located here. Measured: 6 buttons and links, “Monthly” and “Yearly”, 108 words. Absent, not scored 0.
No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Logos · their words: “Logos change. Your code shouldn't.” Logos · 74% to 85% down the pageOur check
Not detectedNothing detected in this section.
No tactic located here. Measured: 2 buttons and links, “Get started for free” and “Contact sales”, 11 words. Absent, not scored 0.
Sections of Pricing. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.1 on 2026-11-04. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.
Something wrong?
What sets it apart
logo.dev does 2 things few peers do.
Each one is run by under 30% of 1,678 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.
-
Usage / adoption proof
Rarity
Only 16%.
of 1,678 SaaS funnels have usage / adoption proof. This site is one of them.
16 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 84 wait outside.
271 of 1678 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where logo.dev does it · Homepage / Lander: “80,000+ developers” FOUND. Only 16% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. logo.dev does. 271 of 1678 SaaS funnels.
-
Us-vs-them comparison
Rarity
Only 29%.
of 1,678 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.
29 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 71 wait outside.
482 of 1678 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where logo.dev does it · Pricing: “comparison grid: 14 rows” FOUND. Only 29% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. logo.dev does. 482 of 1678 SaaS funnels.
What it skips
logo.dev misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
Pricing tiersMISSING52% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. logo.dev doesn't. · 870 of 1678
Lead-capture formOpportunityOnly 28% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 474 of 1678
Examples of this
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 21% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 350 of 1678
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 19% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 313 of 1678
Examples of this
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 5% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 89 of 1678
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 72%.
of 1,684 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Never think about logos again”
- Toggle menu
- Domain
- Look up
- Try stripe.com
- Try nike.com
- Try lego.com
- I'm feeling lucky
- Toggle theme
How it’s built
26 UX checks · 16 pass · 5 need work · 1 note · 4 not measured
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.63×.
Line length
No sampled paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 65 content images carry alt text.
Form labels
All 2 form fields carry a label.
Show the other 20 checks
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (58 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Label in name
No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 390px wide.
Landmark regions
The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.
Keyboard reachability
No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Autocomplete hints
2 of 2 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Tap-target size (mobile)
144 of 172 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Named controls
4 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Render-blocking resources
30 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
30 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
All 1 sampled text runs sit over images or gradients. effective contrast is not computable.
Page weight
At least 1.9 MB across 262 measurable resources, but 229 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Inline validation
No validation attributes were found in the DOM. Script-driven validation is invisible to this check, so absence is not a failure.
Seen on the page
The sections of logo.dev where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
Trusted-by logo wall2 crops
Logos · Pricing 
Logos · Products
How it looks
inter for headlines and text. 5 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Usage / adoption proof: Only 16% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. logo.dev does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
6 of 11 selling tactics found: Usage / adoption proof, Us-vs-them comparison, Demo / docs entry, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 5 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 5 it lacks
- Pricing tiers52% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. logo.dev doesn't. Gap
- Lead-capture formOnly 28% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Usage / adoption proof · the evidence
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 6 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Usage / adoption proof · the evidence
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Pricing tiers · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 9 on the first page
Prices seen · 12
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 5 colours measured
Type scale · 5 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
UXXRAY+
The owner view is for members.
$29/mo. Your rank, your close matches and your fix list, in your own words.
How you rank
Where you rank.
Against sites like yours: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 72%.
of 1,684 multi-step SaaS funnels.
How you compare
You (logo.dev) next to your five close matches.
Same funnel type, most checks found first. Selling checks found, out of the total we check. Each thumbnail is the match’s home page.
Fix list
5 checks on your site need work.
Needs work first, in the order we check. 5 of 26 checks.
1 · How it's built
Needs workTap-target size (mobile)
144 of 172 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile. smallest: “Copy URL” at 28×28px
Fix. Give tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.
2 · How it looks
Needs workBody text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Fix. Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.
3 · How it's built
Needs workNamed controls
4 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Fix. Add aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.
4 · How it's built
Needs workRender-blocking resources
30 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Fix. Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.
5 · How it's built
Needs workOversized images
30 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown. “alex-maccaw.jpg” is 400px wide, displayed at 40px
Fix. Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.
Match gaps
5 tactics your matches use that you don’t.
Most common first. Each rate is a share of the same-type funnels we measured, with its total.
- Pricing tiers52% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. You don’t. Missing
- Lead-capture formOnly 28% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Examples of this
- Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Examples of this
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Your weakest section · How it looks
1 of 3 checks in “How it looks” needs work.
Body text size. Open it in the Design Factory with your five close matches as the reference.
What changed
Since your last scan.
Nothing to compare yet. This is your first scan.
Scanned 2026-11-04. After the next scan, every check that changes shows here.
Re-scan
Scan your site again.
A fresh scan shows where you stand now.
Your five close matches find 9 to 10 of 11 selling checks. You find 6.
Site report · logo.dev · Compare
← Back to the logo.dev reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to logo.dev?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
logo.dev
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.
Thanks — we review every report.
Your report on logo.dev is in.
Staging: not stored