spaceora.app
Beats 13%.
You beat 13%.
of 1,684 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
Below the fold
Section by section.
Each part of the page, with our check beside it.
No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Content Content · 15% to 25% down the pageOur check
Not measuredNot measured for this section.
This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: where it sits on the page. Absent, not scored 0.
Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.1 on 2026-11-04. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.
Something wrong?
What it skips
spaceora.app misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
FAQ / objection handlingMISSING80% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. spaceora.app doesn't. · 1341 of 1678
Demo / docs entryOpportunity36% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 604 of 1678
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 29% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 482 of 1678
Lead-capture formOpportunityOnly 28% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 474 of 1678
Examples of this
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 21% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 350 of 1678
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 19% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 313 of 1678
Examples of this
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 16% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 271 of 1678
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 5% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. · 89 of 1678
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 13%.
of 1,684 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“AI Home Design from Vision to Reality”
- Tools
- Use cases
- Generate
- Start free
How it’s built
26 UX checks · 16 pass · 5 need work · 2 notes · 3 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.5×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 25 content images carry alt text.
Form labels
All 2 form fields carry a label.
Show the other 20 checks
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (54 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
A same-page “skip to content” link was found.
Label in name
No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Landmark regions
The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Autocomplete hints
2 of 11 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.
Line length
1 paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.
Keyboard reachability
15 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Named controls
44 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Render-blocking resources
11 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
36 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Tap-target size (mobile)
58 of 182 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 3.9 MB across 130 measurable resources, but 65 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Inline validation
No validation attributes were found in the DOM. Script-driven validation is invisible to this check, so absence is not a failure.
How it looks
inter for headlines and text. 7 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
3 of 11 selling tactics found: Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, Free trial / freemium. 8 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 8 it lacks
- FAQ / objection handling80% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. spaceora.app doesn't. Gap
- Demo / docs entry36% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 29% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Lead-capture formOnly 28% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 3 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
FAQ / objection handling · who has it
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 4 on the first page
Prices seen · 4
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 7 colours measured
Type scale · 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
UXXRAY+
The owner view is for members.
$29/mo. Your rank, your close matches and your fix list, in your own words.
How you rank
Where you rank.
Against sites like yours: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 13%.
of 1,684 multi-step SaaS funnels.
How you compare
You (spaceora.app) next to your five close matches.
Same funnel type, most checks found first. Selling checks found, out of the total we check. Each thumbnail is the match’s home page.
Fix list
5 checks on your site need work.
Needs work first, in the order we check. 5 of 26 checks.
1 · How it looks
Needs workBody text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Fix. Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.
2 · How it's built
Needs workNamed controls
44 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Fix. Add aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.
3 · How it's built
Needs workRender-blocking resources
11 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Fix. Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.
4 · How it's built
Needs workOversized images
36 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown. “utilo-badge-listed.svg” is 960px wide, displayed at 72px
Fix. Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.
5 · How it's built
Needs workTap-target size (mobile)
58 of 182 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile. smallest: “Instagram” at 32×32px
Fix. Give tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.
Match gaps
8 tactics your matches use that you don’t.
Most common first. Each rate is a share of the same-type funnels we measured, with its total.
- FAQ / objection handling80% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. You don’t. Missing
- Demo / docs entry36% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 29% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Lead-capture formOnly 28% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Examples of this
- Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Examples of this
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,678 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Your weakest section · How it's built
4 of 14 checks in “How it's built” need work.
Named controls · Render-blocking resources · Oversized images · Tap-target size (mobile). Open it in the Design Factory with your five close matches as the reference.
What changed
Since your last scan.
Nothing to compare yet. This is your first scan.
Scanned 2026-11-04. After the next scan, every check that changes shows here.
Re-scan
Scan your site again.
A fresh scan shows where you stand now.
Your five close matches find 9 to 10 of 11 selling checks. You find 3.
Site report · spaceora.app · Compare
← Back to the spaceora.app reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to spaceora.app?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
spaceora.app
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.
Thanks — we review every report.
Your report on spaceora.app is in.
Staging: not stored