content · Aug 9, 2026

tools.arobis.ai

We found more conversion tactics here than on 21% of the 640 entry-page captures we have measured.

1 conversion tactic detected

1 page walked · measured by Roentgen 1.20.1

1 conversion tactic detected
1 page captured
10 UX checks
2 flagged

Walk 0 links seen on the entry page, and none were walkable past it. We only follow a[href], so a funnel behind a button or a login would not appear here.

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel

How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.20.1 on 2026-08-09. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 5 that apply to a content funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

The short version, in 4 parts

Proven on the page
1 conversion tactic detected, each backed by text on the page

Answers buyer objections
What is AI visibility? How is this different from traditional SEO? Which AI engines does t

See all 1
Not seen
4 of 5 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

Press / "as seen in"
Media logos or an "as seen in / featured in" claim borrowing publication credib…
Us-vs-them comparison
A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.
Proof above the fold
Social proof rendered within the first viewport on at least one step.

+ 1 more

See what we looked for
Flagged
3 of 11 build checks flagged, each with a fix

Text contrast (WCAG AA)
93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Body text size
Smallest body text is 11px (base ~20px). below the ~16px readable floor.
Tap-target size (mobile)
6 of 8 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

See the fixes
In their words
The headline: Is your website visible to AI?

Promise
See how visible and citable your website is across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity. Get a free AI Visi…

Read every quote

Scan

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 1

What we recorded

Progress

7 scans

this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans

measured

1 fewer tactic detected 1 → 0 across 7 scans since 2026-08-09. The ruleset changed in this window, so part of this may be our detection improving rather than the page changing.

1 tactic 2026-08-09
→
0 tactics 2026-09-12
→
0 tactics 2026-09-15
→
0 tactics 2026-09-21
→
0 tactics 2026-09-23
→
0 tactics 2026-09-26
→
0 tactics 2026-09-28

The funnel, frame by frame

1 step walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

1 tactic

FAQ

In their own words

22 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: AI Visibility Checker — Free AI SEO Audit | Arobis
Meta description: See how visible and citable your website is across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity. Get a free AI Visibility Score with the exact fixes — no sign-up to start.
Headline: Is your website visible to AI?
Section headings: What your report looks likeHow it worksWhy AI visibility mattersWhat the checker analyzesFrequently asked questionsWant the score fixed for you?Readiness by engineWhat we checked+6 more, not shown
Buttons and links: arobis.aiAnalyze My AI VisibilityTerms of ServicePrivacy PolicyGet Your AI Visibility Audit

Sections

3 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Hero section of tools.arobis.ai — **Hero**1% down the page

FAQ section of tools.arobis.ai — **FAQ**56% down the page

Footer section of tools.arobis.ai — **Footer**98% down the page

What we found

1 tactic

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

objection1 of 2

Answers buyer objections What is AI visibility? How is this different from traditional SEO? Which AI engines does t

What we didn’t find

4 of 5 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see4 of 5 applicable

Press / "as seen in" 642 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Us-vs-them comparison 441 of the 2,420 funnels we checked

Proof above the fold 381 of the 2,420 funnels we checked

Scarcity / urgency copy 125 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

11 run · 3 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

3 of 10 measured checks need work1 could not be measured — not counted either way

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “68” at 2.97:1 (64px, #f76b15 on #ffffff). needs 3:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 11px (base ~20px). below the ~16px readable floor.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

6 of 8 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Arobis AI — home” at 57×28px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing3

Line length

4 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length

Oversized images

2 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

weight:oversized-images

Not measurable1

Page weight

At least 0.7 MB across 17 measurable resources, but 13 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

weight:page-weight

Clear4

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Render-blocking resources

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measured

full palette ordered by on-page usage %

primary#f0ebff

accent#f0ebff

bg#f5f5f7

surface#ffffff

text#6e6e78

See the roles applied

accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job

The quick brown fox72px

Jumps over the lazy dog48px

A subheading in their voice42px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

List item one, at body scale
List item two
List item three

Type scale, weights & families

SIZE SCALE

11pxAa

12pxAa

13pxAa

14pxAa

15pxAa

16pxAa

17pxAa

19pxAa

20pxAa

42pxAa

48pxAa

72pxAa

WEIGHTS

Aa400

Aa600

Aa700

Aa800

FAMILIES

Plus Jakarta Sans

rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

2 of 10 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measured

Elements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran these passes on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Machine version → JSON bundle Markdown brief Design tokens llms.txt