content · Aug 4, 2026
Fewer than 1% of the 640 entry-page captures we have measured showed fewer conversion tactics than we found here.
0 conversion tactics detected
1 page walked · measured by Roentgen 1.18
Walk 6 links seen, 2 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.
Measured by Roentgen 1.18 on 2026-08-04. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.
This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 5 that apply to a content funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.
+ 2 more
Every translation of a word, at a glance
Translate a word into 30 languages at once and instantly check domain availability — find the perfect interna…
see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionthe entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionEvery translation of a word, at a glance - How do we say?
Translate a word into 30 languages at once and instantly check domain availability — find the perfect international name for your startup, brand or project.
Every translation of a word, at a glance
FR
Translate
applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionAbsence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion3 of 11 measured checks need work
0% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 1+ runs fail.
worst: “Translate” at 1:1 (14px, #ffffff on #ffffff). needs 4.5:1
FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.
Smallest body text is 12px (base ~18px). below the ~16px readable floor.
FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.
10 of 11 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
smallest: “FR” at 16×16px
FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.
1 paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.
FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.
type:No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
FixAdd a first-in-DOM <a href="#main"> that is visible on focus.
a11y:1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
FixMake the accessible name start with the visible label text.
a11y:No autocomplete attributes across 2 fields. browsers cannot autofill.
FixAdd autocomplete="email"/"tel"/"name" to identity fields.
forms:Mobile viewport · Language declared · Page weight · Render-blocking resources
palette by on-page usage · type rendered live
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionBody copy in their text role, on a surface card.
Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.
layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionElements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text
What we found — conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each
Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted
We ran these passes on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.
