saas · Oct 13, 2026

linkeddit.com

We found more conversion tactics here than on 96% of the 1,413 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

8 conversion tactics detected

4 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.28.1

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.28.1 on 2026-10-13. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,864 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 96% of them.

Walk 137 links on the entry page, 98 walkable. 4 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

  1. Proven on the page

    8 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

    Compares itself against alternatives
    comparison table: Features · Pro $29/mo Start Pro · Compete $99/mo Start Compete · Enterpr
    Answers buyer objections
    Frequently asked questions
    Offers a free trial or free tier
    Start free

    + 5 more with evidence

    See all 8

  2. Not seen

    3 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

    Lead-capture form
    An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a che…
    Proof above the fold
    Social proof rendered within the first viewport on at least one step.
    Scarcity / urgency copy
    Scarcity or time-pressure copy ("only N left", "selling fast", "limited time")…

    See what we looked for

  3. Flagged

    5 of 15 build checks flagged, each with a fix

    Text contrast (WCAG AA)
    78% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
    Body text size
    Smallest sampled text is 8px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
    Page weight
    At least 34.0 MB across 383 measurable resources. 218 cross-origin resources did not expo…

    + 2 more

    See the fixes

  4. Walked

    4 pages walked, Core to Compare

    Step 1
    Core
    Step 2
    Pricing
    Step 3
    Demo

    + 1 more step

    Walk it frame by frame

  5. In their words

    The headline: Competitive intelligence for small SaaS teams.

    Promise
    Track competitor moves, customer complaints and AI recommendation gaps. Bring weekly intelligence into Claude…
    Prices shown
    $99 · $40 · $20

    Read every quote

Captured Core
Step 1 · Core1 / 4

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Core
01

Core

8 tactics

$99 +4 more  ·  subscription

FAQTrust badgesPressFree trialNo cardLogo wallPricing tiersDemo / docs
Pricing
02

Pricing

▲ strongest
9 tactics

$199 +5 more  ·  Save 42%  ·  subscription  ·  1 proof point

Sticky CTAComparisonPressFree trialNo cardLogo wallUsage proofPricing tiersDemo / docs
Demo
03

Demo

6 tactics
PressFree trialNo cardLogo wallUsage proofDemo / docs
Compare
04

Compare

▼ thinnest
5 tactics

$99 +1 more  ·  subscription

PressNo cardLogo wallPricing tiersDemo / docs

In their own words

36 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
Competitive Intelligence for Small SaaS Teams | Linkeddit
Meta description
Track competitor moves, customer complaints and AI recommendation gaps. Bring weekly intelligence into Claude or ChatGPT with Linkeddit.
Headline
Competitive intelligence for small SaaS teams.
Section headings
What does your SaaS team need to decide this week?Your agent calls LinkedditEvery competitor move, in one weekly brief.Get recommended when buyers ask AI which tool to useWin the answers. Bank up to 128,000+ visits a month.Rank in Google and AI answers with Reddit contentFind the buyers ready to switch to youWhat can you do with demand intelligence?+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links
FeaturesCompeteDemandAnswer RadarContentGenerate draftBuyer intentCompetitor complaintsAI reply draftsReddit DM automation+2 more, not shown
Prices on the page
$99$40$20$29$199

Sections

5 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Nav section of linkeddit.com
Nav0% down the page
Hero section of linkeddit.com
Hero0% down the page
Logos section of linkeddit.com
Logos10% down the page
FAQ section of linkeddit.com
FAQ80% down the page
Footer section of linkeddit.com
Footer91% down the page

What we found

8 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

objection2 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives comparison table: Features · Pro $29/mo Start Pro · Compete $99/mo Start Compete · Enterpr
Answers buyer objections Frequently asked questions

proof3 of 4

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim trusted by
Puts a number on adoption 10,000+ businesses
Shows press logos or an as-seen-in claim featured on

offer2 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier Start free
Makes the pricing ladder explicit $99/mo, $29/mo, free

checkout1 of 2

Offers a demo or docs entry point docs link

What we didn’t find

3 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see3 of 11 applicable

Lead-capture form 457 of the 1,760 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 406 of the 2,525 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 131 of the 2,522 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

15 run · 5 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

5 of 15 measured checks need work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

78% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “Weekly brief” at 1.04:1 (14px, #ffffff on #fbfafa). needs 4.5:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 8px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Page weight

weight:page-weight

At least 34.0 MB across 383 measurable resources. 218 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

FixCompress and lazy-load below-the-fold media; drop unused third-party scripts.

Oversized images

weight:oversized-images

118 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“icon.bf1dd24e.png” is 1024px wide, displayed at 28px

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

65 of 73 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Menu” at 36×36px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing7

Line length

36 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Heading levels

7 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

FixStep heading levels one at a time; use CSS for size, not a deeper level.

a11y:heading-levels
Render-blocking resources

7 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

FixDefer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

weight:render-blocking-resources
Landmark regions

No <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

FixWrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).

structure:landmark-regions
Keyboard reachability

119 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

FixUse <button>/<a>, or add role + tabindex="0" and a key handler.

structure:keyboard-reachability

Clear3

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
accent#f2f0ee
bg#fbfafa
surface#ffffff
text#4b5563
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox140px
Jumps over the lazy dog20px
A subheading in their voice18px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
8pxAa
9pxAa
10pxAa
11pxAa
12pxAa
13pxAa
14pxAa
15pxAa
16pxAa
18pxAa
20pxAa
140pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
FAMILIES
__Instrument_Sans_3d9088
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

2 of 9 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Elements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran these passes on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Similar crawls