saas · Aug 15, 2026

pallix.in

70/100 Partial

Scores above 81% of 1,252 multi-step funnels we have measured. Among the 959 saas funnels in that group, above 76%.

7/11 tactics
3 steps
12 checks
3 flagged

How this was measured

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel.

Measured by Roentgen 1.25.1, one of our versioned rulesets. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Walk 25 links seen, 15 walkable, 2 matched, and we walked 3 pages.

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 3

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

3 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest

6 tactics

ReviewsFAQTrust badgesPressLogo wallDemo / docs

Pricing

5 tactics

₹2,249 +5 more · save 10% · subscription · 1 proof point

ReviewsComparisonFAQFree trialDemo / docs

Demo

▼ thinnest

1 tactic

Demo / docs

In their own words

31 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: Pallix | AI Visibility & Citation Intelligence
Meta description: Track how your brand appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI and Copilot—then find the sources, competitors and gaps shaping those answers.
Headline: Source-backed AI search intelligence for freelancers.
Section headings: BRANDS WE HAVE ANALYSEDA real look inside the Pallix workspace.From invisible problem to measurable action.AI may be learning what to say about you from your competitors.Measure what your customers actually see.Talk to our team or see your first result now.Understand AI visibility before investing in it.See Pallix with your brand in mind.+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links: Book a demoRun free auditOverviewSentimentCompetitorsMarket intelCitation performanceAI sourcingSource gapsFixes+2 more, not shown

Sections

4 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Nav section of pallix.in — **Nav**0% down the page

Hero section of pallix.in — **Hero**1% down the page

FAQ section of pallix.in — **FAQ**80% down the page

Footer section of pallix.in — **Footer**93% down the page

What we found

7 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

Action path3 of 4

Offers a free trial or free tier free trial

Lead-capture form name, email, company, website

Offers a demo or docs entry point Book a demo

Trust & proof1 of 2

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim logos: Listed on AIDirs, Listed on SaaS Cubes, Listed on Turbo0

Friction reduction2 of 2

Answers buyer objections QUESTIONS, ANSWERED Understand AI visibility before investing in it. What is AI visibility

Offers a free trial or free tier free trial

Value reinforcement1 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives comparison grid: 11 rows

What we didn’t find

4 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see4 of 11 applicable

Pricing tiers 636 of 1248 measured funnels run this

Proof above the fold 292 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Usage / adoption proof 224 of 1369 measured funnels run this

Scarcity / urgency copy 94 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

12 run · 3 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

Readability & contrastclear

Text contrast (WCAG AA) passescontrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

98% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 25% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

Mobile & tap targets1 flagged

Mobile viewport passesmobile:mobile-viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Tap-target size (mobile) needs workmobile:tap-target-size-mobile

52 of 81 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Sign in” at 40×21px

fix Give tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Typography1 flagged

Body text size needs worktype:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 8px (base ~16px). below the ~16px readable floor.

fix Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Accessibility hygieneclear

Weight & delivery1 flagged

Page weight not measurableweight:page-weight

At least 0.5 MB across 60 measurable resources, but 44 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Render-blocking resources passesweight:render-blocking-resources

3 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

fix Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

Oversized images needs workweight:oversized-images

16 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“image?url=%2Ficon.png&w=64&q=75” is 256px wide, displayed at 27px

fix Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.