primaleva.com

0 of 7.

selling tactics found. 16 of 25 UX checks pass.

primaleva.com desktop capture of the first page
Scanned 2026-10-29Content

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

7 tactics primaleva.com could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Fewer than 1% of the 690 entry-page captures we have measured showed fewer conversion tactics than we found here.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“This domain is for sale”

  • Send

How it’s built

25 UX checks · 16 pass · 4 need work · 3 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 13px; first paragraph 16px.

Pass

Line length

No sampled paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Form labels

All 4 form fields carry a label.

Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Show the other 19 checks
Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Page weight

At least 0.0 MB across 1 measurable resources.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

No stylesheet or script in <head> blocks first paint.

Pass

Oversized images

No image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Autocomplete hints

1 of 4 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.

Pass

Inline validation

3 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Heading structure

The landing page has 2 <h1> elements (expected 1).

Note

Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

0% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 1+ runs fail. 86% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

Needs work

Page title

The landing page has an empty <title>. It is the first thing a screen reader announces and the browser-tab and search-result label.

Needs work

Landmark regions

No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

1 of 1 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Line height

No body line-height was captured for this page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

How it looks

system-ui for headlines and text. 2 colours measured.

How it sells

What Plus adds.

No selling tactics found. 7 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which 7 it lacks
    • Trusted-by logo wall38% of 160 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • FAQ / objection handling37% of 252 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 14% of 249 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 4% of 160 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 4% of 252 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 2% of 252 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 0% of 249 content funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour and size

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 1 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colours and type, in full.

Every colour and size we measured.

Colours · 2 measured, with their share

Plus · $29/mo

Type · system-ui, 4 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Get Plus · $29/moOpening soon.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-29, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk no links at all on the entry page. That is a fact about what we could read, not about the site.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · primaleva.com · Compare

← Back to the primaleva.com report

Compare

Put your site next to primaleva.com.

Every number, side by side.