saas · Oct 13, 2026

projectcommander.app

We found more conversion tactics here than on 10% of the 1,413 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

3 conversion tactics detected

4 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.28.1

3 conversion tactics detected
4 pages captured
12 UX checks
4 flagged

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel

How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.28.1 on 2026-10-13. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,864 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 20% of them.

Walk 30 links on the entry page, 23 walkable. 5 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

Proven on the page
3 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

Compares itself against alternatives
comparison grid: 23 rows
Offers a free trial or free tier
No credit card required
Offers a demo or docs entry point
docs link

See all 3
Not seen
8 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

FAQ / objection handling
An accordion / FAQ block answering objections.
Trusted-by logo wall
Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim.
Pricing tiers
Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing.

+ 5 more

See what we looked for
Flagged
5 of 13 build checks flagged, each with a fix

Text contrast (WCAG AA)
93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Oversized images
19 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

+ 2 more

See the fixes
Walked
4 pages walked, Homepage / Lander to Compare Portfolio Herocoders

Step 1
Homepage / Lander
Step 2
Compare
Step 3
Compare Tempo Capacity Planner

+ 1 more step

Walk it frame by frame
In their words
The headline: Plan the work. Forecast the date. Monitor what threatens it.

Promise
Is your Jira plan realistically deliverable? Project Commander forecasts a finish date from your team's real…

Read every quote

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 4

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest

2 tactics

subscription

No cardDemo / docs

Compare

2 tactics

ComparisonDemo / docs

Compare Tempo Capacity Planner

1 tactic

subscription

Demo / docs

Compare Portfolio Herocoders

▼ thinnest

1 tactic

Demo / docs

In their own words

23 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: Project Commander: Jira Delivery Forecasting & Feasibility
Meta description: Is your Jira plan realistically deliverable? Project Commander forecasts a finish date from your team's real capacity, flags overloaded people and threatened dependencies, and shows what to change. Free on Jira Cloud.
Headline: Plan the work. Forecast the date. Monitor what threatens it.
Section headings: Demand vs. capacityWhy Project Commander existsAsk it about your project. Get the figures, not a guess.A Complete Toolkit — Plan, Forecast, MonitorSprint 7 is overcommitted. Sprint 8 is even worse.Someone is underwater. How much can your team take on?You committed to a date. Is it still realistic?See the impact before you make the call.+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links: Try the live demoWatch: the slip, the cause, and the fix39 secSee All Features with ScreenshotsTry the live demo →

Sections

5 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Nav section of projectcommander.app — **Nav**0% down the page

Hero section of projectcommander.app — **Hero**0% down the page

Features section of projectcommander.app — **Features**19% down the page

Logos section of projectcommander.app — **Logos**95% down the page

Footer section of projectcommander.app — **Footer**98% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measured

No credit card element — **No credit card**“No credit card required”

What we found

3 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

objection1 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives comparison grid: 23 rows

offer1 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier No credit card required

checkout1 of 2

Offers a demo or docs entry point docs link

What we didn’t find

8 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see8 of 11 applicable

FAQ / objection handling 1,696 of the 2,525 funnels we checked

Trusted-by logo wall 1,546 of the 2,138 funnels we checked

Pricing tiers 905 of the 1,750 SaaS funnels we checked

Press / "as seen in" 673 of the 2,522 funnels we checked

Lead-capture form 457 of the 1,760 funnels we checked

Proof above the fold 406 of the 2,525 funnels we checked

Usage / adoption proof 301 of the 2,138 funnels we checked

Scarcity / urgency copy 131 of the 2,522 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

13 run · 5 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

5 of 13 measured checks need work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “Jul 27” at 2.98:1 (10px, #8896b0 on #ffffff). needs 4.5:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Oversized images

weight:oversized-images

19 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“sprints-full.png” is 2880px wide, displayed at 1092px

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

Landmark regions

structure:landmark-regions

No <header> or <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

FixWrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

99 of 125 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “FAQ” at 31×36px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing3

Line length

79 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length

Clear5

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Page weight · Render-blocking resources

Playbook match

1 matched

which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

derived

MATCH Playbook #3 — Intent-Match Funnelstrategy guide

Comparison surface matches the Intent-Match pattern — measured comparison table plus comparison-intent copy

comparison table p2: comparison grid: 23 rowscomparison copy Demand vs. capacity

A match means this funnel's measurable surfaces fit the playbook's pattern — the quoted language is what fired the detection. A lever is one playbook mechanism observed on-page. We never claim what a brand's ads or emails do; a crawl can't see them. All funnel designs →

Two different things sit side by side here. The claim and its quoted evidence are measured on this funnel, the same way every other fact on this page is. The playbook itself is written guidance — our strategy library, not a measurement of this site — and it lives behind the links above. Nothing on this page recommends what this brand should do.