content · Sep 30, 2026

realworldappeal.com

We found more conversion tactics here than on 21% of the 640 entry-page captures we have measured.

1 conversion tactic detected

1 page walked · measured by Roentgen 1.28.1

Walk 32 links seen, 12 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.28.1 on 2026-09-30. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 7 that apply to a content funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

The short version, in 4 parts

  1. Proven on the page

    1 conversion tactic detected, each backed by text on the page

    Shows press logos or an as-seen-in claim
    featured on

    See all 1

  2. Not seen

    6 of 7 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

    FAQ / objection handling
    An accordion / FAQ block answering objections.
    Trusted-by logo wall
    Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim.
    Us-vs-them comparison
    A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.

    + 3 more

    See what we looked for

  3. Flagged

    4 of 13 build checks flagged, each with a fix

    Text contrast (WCAG AA)
    85% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 18% of text was unmeasurable (over i…
    Body text size
    Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
    Oversized images
    5 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

    + 1 more

    See the fixes

  4. In their words

    The headline: See how women perceive you at first glance.

    Promise
    Real-world attractiveness assessment for men — AI-calibrated to how women feel in the first 1-3 seconds: face…

    Read every quote

Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 1

What we recorded

Progress

2 scans

this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Unchanged across 2 scans Same 1 conversion tactic detected since 2026-08-11.
  1. 1 tactic 2026-08-11
  2. 1 tactic 2026-09-30

The funnel, frame by frame

1 step walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

4 tactics
Free giftTrust badgesPressFree trial

In their own words

18 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
Real World Appeal — How attractive are you, at first sight?
Meta description
Real-world attractiveness assessment for men — AI-calibrated to how women feel in the first 1-3 seconds: face, physique, outfit, vibe. 1-min test.
Headline
See how women perceive you at first glance.
Section headings
Two steps to a real scoreLatest from the playbookSimulates a true first glanceThreshold-triggered, not linearSpecific, executable adviceYour photos belong to youAnswer a few basicsUpload two photos+2 more, not shown
Buttons and links
English中文Sign inStart testStart the free test

Sections

4 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Nav section of realworldappeal.com
Nav0% down the page
Hero section of realworldappeal.com
Hero1% down the page
Features section of realworldappeal.com
Features33% down the page
Footer section of realworldappeal.com
Footer94% down the page

What we found

1 tactic

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

proof1 of 4

Shows press logos or an as-seen-in claim featured on

What we didn’t find

6 of 7 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see6 of 7 applicable

FAQ / objection handling 1,615 of the 2,420 funnels we checked
Trusted-by logo wall 1,484 of the 2,043 funnels we checked
Us-vs-them comparison 441 of the 2,420 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 381 of the 2,420 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 289 of the 2,043 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 125 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

13 run · 4 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

4 of 13 measured checks need work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

85% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 18% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “Built on” at 2.57:1 (11px, #52525b on #09090b). needs 4.5:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Oversized images

weight:oversized-images

5 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“real-world-appeal” is 760px wide, displayed at 144px

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

25 of 41 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Menu” at 40×40px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing4

Line length

6 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

FixStep heading levels one at a time; use CSS for size, not a deeper level.

a11y:heading-levels
Keyboard reachability

1 element looks clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

FixUse <button>/<a>, or add role + tabindex="0" and a key handler.

structure:keyboard-reachability

Clear5

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Page weight · Render-blocking resources

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
accent#09090b
bg#09090b
surface#09090b
text#a1a1aa
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox72px
Jumps over the lazy dog36px
A subheading in their voice24px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
11pxAa
12pxAa
13pxAa
14pxAa
15pxAa
16pxAa
18pxAa
20pxAa
24pxAa
36pxAa
72pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
FAMILIES
Poppins
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

2 of 10 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Elements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran these passes on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Similar crawls