Above-the-fold capture of renamer.ai
their above-the-fold, as captured

UXXRAY · Teardown dossier ◉ scanned Jul 20, 2026

renamer.ai

saas · desktop · Roentgen 1.4

Biggest quick win

87% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

8 of 9 conversion signals detected

90 /100 coverage

Excellent ★★★★★ weighted for impact · 5 measured categories

UXXRAY scans for 9 conversion tactics with deterministic rules. Unconventional builds may not register, so this is detection coverage, not a verdict. Scored by Roentgen 1.4; detection improves, so rescan anytime.

Score breakdown

  • Offer clarity 8/8
  • Action path 20/20
  • Trust & proof 11/11
  • Friction reduction 10/10
  • Value reinforcement 3/10

The funnel, frame by frame

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by stepmeasured
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest
9 tactics

$0 +4 more  ·  Save 40%  ·  1 proof point

Sticky CTAFAQTrust badgesFree trialNo cardLogo wallUsage proofPricing tiersDemo / docs
Solutions
02

Solutions

2 tactics
Sticky CTAFree trial
Auth
03

Auth

▼ thinnest
2 tactics
No cardLogo wall

Offer

how clearly they present the deal and its valuemeasured
8/8highpoints earned
  • Pricing tiersfree, $9.95/mo, $29.95/mo, $99.95/mo

Action

the path to convert. CTA, sign-up, checkoutmeasured
20/20highpoints earned
  • Proof above the foldIMG_20240318_143052.jpg Board Meeting - Q1 Budget Review.jpg
  • Free trial / freemiumTry freeTry it free
  • Lead-capture form
  • Demo / docs entry

Trust

proof, social proof, and credibilitymeasured
11/11highpoints earned
  • Trusted-by logo walllogos: Hero folder front, Hero folder back, User 1, User 2, User 3logos: User 1, User 2, User 3, User 4, User 5
  • Usage / adoption proof6100+ users

Friction

objections answered, barriers removedmeasured
10/10highpoints earned
  • FAQ / objection handling
  • Free trial / freemiumTry freeTry it free

Value

why it’s worth it. comparison and reinforcementmeasured
3/10partialpoints earned
  • Usage / adoption proof6100+ users

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • us-vs-them comparison

UX signals

measured UX quality. contrast · mobile · type · a11y · layoutmeasured
Leaky
4 flags · 9 checks

Measured UX quality. flags, not opinions. Deterministic, evidence-backed, and kept separate from the conversion score.

Readability & contrast

WCAG AA on measurable text. worst offenders quoted, never a fail we can’t compute.
NEEDS WORKText contrast (WCAG AA)

87% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “Get started for Free” at 1:1 (12px, #f0f5f7 on #f0f5f7). needs 4.5:1

Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targets

Responsive viewport + touch-target sizes where it matters.
GOODMobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography

Body size, line-height, line length. is the pitch actually readable?
NEEDS WORKBody text size

Smallest body text is 8px (base ~12px). below the ~16px readable floor.

Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

NEEDS WORKLine height

Body line-height is 1.14×. tight enough to hurt readability.

Set body line-height to ~1.4-1.6×.

NOTELine length

5 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene

Language, alt text, form labels, named controls, headings, link clarity.
GOODLanguage declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

GOODImage alt text

All 27 content images carry alt text.

NOTEForm labels

3 form fields rely on placeholder text as the only label.

Back placeholders with a real <label>. placeholder text vanishes on input.

NEEDS WORKNamed controls

1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Add aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.

Next move

Now line it up against a competitor.

Paste any URL. We’ll run the same scan, the same rubric, and put the two funnels side by side. category by category, all measured.

Live scan · 15-25 sec · same rubric · nothing is guessed

Brand kit

palette by on-page usage · type rendered livemeasured
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#4195d9
accent#4195d9
bg#f0f5f7
surface#ffffff
text#5c6b73
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox36px
Jumps over the lazy dog30px
A subheading in their voice24px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three

Teardown report. copy for your LLM

the full evidence-based read: what this funnel does well, where it is thin, and the on-page proof for each. paste into any agent to learn from
renamer.ai · 8/9 tactics · 1 proof templates · evidence-backed
# Agent Brief. build in the style of renamer.ai

> Machine-extracted from a live on-demand funnel teardown (2026-07-20). 100% facts —
> measured tokens, detected patterns, harvested proof strings. No LLM interpretation.
> Single-page capture (MVP): homepage/landing page only, no funnel walk.
> Tokens: `tokens.json` / `tailwind.css`.

**Category (label):** —
**Funnel:** Homepage / Lander → Solutions → Auth

## Palette (area-weighted from live CSS)
| Hex | Usage | Likely role |
|-----|------:|-------------|
| `#f0f5f7` | 62.7% | background |
| `#ffffff` | 34.5% | background |
| `#d0dfe7` | 1.3% | background |
| `#4195d9` | 1.1% | accent/brand |
| `#00141f` | 0.4% | support |
| `#77a2b8` | 0% | support |

Curated roles: `primary=#4195d9` · `accent=#4195d9` · `bg=#f0f5f7` · `surface=#ffffff` · `text=#5c6b73`

## Type
- Display: `geist`
- Body: `geistMono`
- Size scale (px): 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 24, 30, 36
- Radius (px): 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 9999

## Patterns detected (fact-based). 8/9
- **FAQ / objection handling**. An accordion / FAQ block answering objections. _(home: What is Renamer.ai and how does it work?)_
- **Proof above the fold**. Social proof rendered within the first viewport on at least one step. _(signup: IMG_20240318_143052.jpg
Board Meeting - Q1 Budget Review.jpg)_
- **Free trial / freemium**. A free trial, free tier, or "no credit card" entry offer. _(home: Try free; p2: Try it free; signup: No credit card required)_
- **Trusted-by logo wall**. Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim. _(home: logos: Hero folder front, Hero folder back, User 1, User 2, User 3; signup: logos: User 1, User 2, User 3, User 4, User 5)_
- **Usage / adoption proof**. A count of developers / teams / companies / stars using the product. _(home: 6100+ users)_
- **Pricing tiers**. Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing. _(home: free, $9.95/mo, $29.95/mo, $99.95/mo)_
- **Demo / docs entry**. A "book a demo" or documentation / API entry point. _(home: documentation)_
- **Lead-capture form**. An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a checkout. _(home: Add context here, email, message)_

## Proof language (harvested strings → templates)
- `Save {N}%`. e.g. "Save 40%"

## Funnel facts
- Depth reached: 3 step(s) (single-page MVP capture)
- Proof points: 1 across 1 step(s)
- Discount/anchor pricing: yes · Countdown: no · Subscription: no

## To replicate
Match the palette + type tokens above and deploy the detected patterns. This is a single-page capture. no cart/checkout tactics were evaluated.