sive.rs

0 of 7.

selling tactics found. 14 of 24 UX checks pass.

sive.rs desktop capture of the first page
Scanned 2026-10-29Content

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

7 tactics sive.rs could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Fewer than 1% of the 690 entry-page captures we have measured showed fewer conversion tactics than we found here.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Derek Sivers”

  • search

How it’s built

24 UX checks · 14 pass · 1 needs work · 4 notes · 5 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line length

No sampled paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Show the other 18 checks
Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (24 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

No stylesheet or script in <head> blocks first paint.

Pass

Oversized images

No image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Note

Heading structure

The landing page has 2 <h1> elements (expected 1).

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Landmark regions

No <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Note

Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 2 fields. browsers cannot autofill.

Needs work

Form labels

1 of 1 form fields have no label.

Not checked

Body text size

No body text size was captured, so this cannot be judged.

Not checked

Line height

No body line-height was captured for this page.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.0 MB across 1 measurable resources, but 1 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Not checked

Inline validation

No validation attributes were found in the DOM. Script-driven validation is invisible to this check, so absence is not a failure.

How it looks

v for headlines and text. 2 colours measured.

How it sells

What Plus adds.

No selling tactics found. 7 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which 7 it lacks
    • Trusted-by logo wall38% of 160 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • FAQ / objection handling37% of 252 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 14% of 249 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 4% of 160 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 4% of 252 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 2% of 252 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 0% of 249 content funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour and size

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 1 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colours and type, in full.

Every colour and size we measured.

Colours · 2 measured, with their share

Plus · $29/mo

Type · v, 1 size

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Get Plus · $29/moOpening soon.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-29, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 1 links seen, 1 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · sive.rs · Compare

← Back to the sive.rs report

Compare

Put your site next to sive.rs.

Every number, side by side.