saas · Sep 15, 2026

ito.ai

We found more conversion tactics here than on 67% of the 1,350 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

6 conversion tactics detected

4 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.27.0

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-15. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,781 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 72% of them.

Walk 55 links on the entry page, 42 walkable. 4 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

  1. Proven on the page

    6 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

    Answers buyer objections
    FAQs
    Puts proof in the first viewport
    50 Code Reviews included per seat
    Offers a free trial or free tier
    no credit card required

    + 3 more with evidence

    See all 6

  2. Not seen

    5 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

    Press / "as seen in"
    Media logos or an "as seen in / featured in" claim borrowing publication credib…
    Us-vs-them comparison
    A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.
    Lead-capture form
    An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a che…

    + 2 more

    See what we looked for

  3. Flagged

    4 of 13 build checks flagged, each with a fix

    Text contrast (WCAG AA)
    93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
    Body text size
    Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
    Page weight
    At least 5.3 MB across 100 measurable resources. 305 cross-origin resources did not expos…

    + 1 more

    See the fixes

  4. Walked

    4 pages walked, Homepage / Lander to Pricing

    Step 1
    Homepage / Lander
    Step 2
    Review
    Step 3
    Features

    + 1 more step

    Walk it frame by frame

  5. In their words

    The headline: Catch all runtime bugs before merge.

    Promise
    Ito is runtime code review for pull requests. It builds your app, tests impacted flows, and posts video + rep…

    Read every quote

Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 4

What we recorded

Progress

3 scans

this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Unchanged across 3 scans Same 6 conversion tactics detected since 2026-08-09.
  1. 6 tactics 2026-08-09
  2. 6 tactics 2026-08-15
  3. 6 tactics 2026-09-15

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

4 tactics
Sticky CTANo cardLogo wallDemo / docs
Review
02

Review

4 tactics
Sticky CTANo cardLogo wallDemo / docs
Features
03

Features

▼ thinnest
4 tactics
Sticky CTANo cardLogo wallDemo / docs
Pricing
04

Pricing

▲ strongest
7 tactics

$40 +2 more

Sticky CTAFAQFree trialNo cardLogo wallPricing tiersDemo / docs

In their own words

31 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
Runtime Code Review That Runs Your App on Every PR | Ito
Meta description
Ito is runtime code review for pull requests. It builds your app, tests impacted flows, and posts video + repro evidence before you merge.
Headline
Catch all runtime bugs before merge.
Section headings
Ship faster than ever without sacrificing qualityIto tests everything your app actually does when it runsShip fast, test automaticallyAgents are writing (and using) all the code.Nothing in the code diff in the PR that Ito reviewed had any direct sign of this bug. If Ito had only been looking at the diff lines from the PR, then it wouldn't have caught this.Ito helps my team ship faster by testing all edge cases right on their PRs. I refuse to go back to manual testing.Ito caught 3-4 real things that got fixed in the first week. Impressed that backend mocking works autonomously.Catch runtime errors no one else can+6 more, not shown
Buttons and links
FeaturesResourcesWATCH 2 MIN DEMOWhat is Ito?How does Ito test pull requests?Does Ito access our source code?How long does setup take?How does Ito handle authenticated user flows?Which tech stacks does Ito support?What does the testing report include?+2 more, not shown

Sections

5 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Nav section of ito.ai
Nav0% down the page
Hero section of ito.ai
Hero0% down the page
Logos section of ito.ai
Logos5% down the page
FAQ section of ito.ai
FAQ79% down the page
Footer section of ito.ai
Footer94% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
No credit card element
No credit card“GET STARTED no credit card required WATCH 2 MIN DEMO”

What we found

6 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

objection1 of 2

Answers buyer objections FAQs

proof2 of 4

Puts proof in the first viewport 50 Code Reviews included per seat
Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim trusted by

offer2 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier no credit card required
Makes the pricing ladder explicit $40/mo, free, $40/seat

checkout1 of 2

Offers a demo or docs entry point docs link

What we didn’t find

5 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see5 of 11 applicable

Press / "as seen in" 642 of the 2,417 funnels we checked
Us-vs-them comparison 441 of the 2,420 funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 437 of the 1,683 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 289 of the 2,043 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 125 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

13 run · 4 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

4 of 13 measured checks need work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “chatwoot/chatwoot” at 1:1 (12px, #ffffff on #ffffff). needs 4.5:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Page weight

weight:page-weight

At least 5.3 MB across 100 measurable resources. 305 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

FixCompress and lazy-load below-the-fold media; drop unused third-party scripts.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

164 of 256 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “GET STARTED” at 112×36px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing5

Line length

4 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Render-blocking resources

5 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

FixDefer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

weight:render-blocking-resources
Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 1 field. browsers cannot autofill.

FixAdd autocomplete="email"/"tel"/"name" to identity fields.

forms:autocomplete-hints

Clear4

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Inline validation

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
accent#fcfcfc
bg#fcfcfc
surface#eaeaea
text#727272
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox48px
Jumps over the lazy dog40px
A subheading in their voice36px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
11pxAa
12pxAa
14pxAa
16pxAa
18pxAa
20pxAa
24pxAa
28pxAa
32pxAa
36pxAa
40pxAa
48pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa700
FAMILIES
fontRepro
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

1 of 10 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Similar crawls