saas · Oct 2, 2026

maturityhr.com

We found more conversion tactics here than on 67% of the 1,331 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

6 conversion tactics detected

4 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.28.1

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.28.1 on 2026-10-02. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,748 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 72% of them.

Walk 39 links on the entry page, 33 walkable. 5 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

  1. Proven on the page

    6 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

    Compares itself against alternatives
    Compare packages
    Answers buyer objections
    Frequently asked questions
    Offers a free trial or free tier
    free trial

    + 3 more with evidence

    See all 6

  2. Not seen

    5 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

    Pricing tiers
    Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing.
    Lead-capture form
    An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a che…
    Proof above the fold
    Social proof rendered within the first viewport on at least one step.

    + 2 more

    See what we looked for

  3. Flagged

    5 of 13 build checks flagged, each with a fix

    Body text size
    Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
    Language declared
    No html[lang] attribute. screen readers can’t pick the right voice.
    Oversized images
    9 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

    + 2 more

    See the fixes

  4. Walked

    4 pages walked, Homepage / Lander to Images

    Step 1
    Homepage / Lander
    Step 2
    Product Tour
    Step 3
    Pricing

    + 1 more step

    Walk it frame by frame

  5. In their words

    The headline: Connect competence management to the whole People agenda

    Promise
    Competency management software that brings competence management, People processes, and organizational values…

    Read every quote

Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 4

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest
6 tactics
FAQPressFree trialNo cardLogo wallDemo / docs
Product Tour
02

Product Tour

5 tactics
PressFree trialNo cardLogo wallDemo / docs
Pricing
03

Pricing

4 tactics

€49 +3 more  ·  subscription

ComparisonPressFree trialDemo / docs
Images
04

Images

▼ thinnest
0 tactics

no named tactics detected on this step

In their own words

31 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
MaturityHR: competency management software for People development
Meta description
Competency management software that brings competence management, People processes, and organizational values into one view. 6 process areas, 24 sub-areas, 3 dimensions. Prioritize development initiatives and follow progress over time.
Headline
Connect competence management to the whole People agenda
Section headings
A shared picture you can work withCompetence management is a broad whole, and that is exactly the problemIn competence management, everything connects to everythingBring competence management into one continuous viewMaturity, initiatives, and role differences in one viewYour data stays under your controlThree steps to continuous trackingWho MaturityHR is built for+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links
What is MaturityHR?How is this different from an employee survey?How is this different from a skills assessment?How long does implementation take?How much does MaturityHR cost?Who owns the assessment data?Can the metrics be customized?Is MaturityHR an LMS (learning management system)?Is MaturityHR an HR system (HRIS)?Can I export and delete my data?+2 more, not shown

Sections

3 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Nav section of maturityhr.com
Nav0% down the page
Hero section of maturityhr.com
Hero1% down the page
Footer section of maturityhr.com
Footer93% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
No credit card element
No credit card“7-day free trial. No credit card required.”

What we found

6 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

objection2 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives Compare packages
Answers buyer objections Frequently asked questions

proof2 of 4

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim logo wall (5 distinct marks)
Shows press logos or an as-seen-in claim featured on

offer1 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier free trial

checkout1 of 2

Offers a demo or docs entry point Book a demo

What we didn’t find

5 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see5 of 11 applicable

Pricing tiers 866 of the 1,654 SaaS funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 432 of the 1,664 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 367 of the 2,382 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 282 of the 2,012 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 122 of the 2,379 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

13 run · 5 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

5 of 12 measured checks need work1 could not be measured — not counted either way

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Language declared

a11y:language-declared

No html[lang] attribute. screen readers can’t pick the right voice.

FixAdd lang="en" (or the page’s language) to <html>.

Oversized images

weight:oversized-images

9 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“EMBED2.png” is 600px wide, displayed at 189px

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

Landmark regions

structure:landmark-regions

No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

FixWrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

89 of 146 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Pricing” at 79×40px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing4

Line length

10 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Image alt text

1 of 20 content images (5%) have no alt attribute.

FixAdd descriptive alt to content images; alt="" for purely decorative ones.

a11y:image-alt-text
Label in name

3 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

FixMake the accessible name start with the visible label text.

a11y:label-in-name

Not measurable1

Page weight

At least 1.1 MB across 127 measurable resources, but 90 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

weight:page-weight

Clear3

Text contrast (WCAG AA) · Mobile viewport · Render-blocking resources

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
accent#182335
bg#f6f8f9
surface#ffffff
text#495465
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox54px
Jumps over the lazy dog36px
A subheading in their voice30px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
11pxAa
12pxAa
14pxAa
16pxAa
18pxAa
20pxAa
24pxAa
30pxAa
36pxAa
54pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
FAMILIES
ui-sans-serif
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

1 of 9 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Similar crawls