content · Aug 3, 2026
0/100 Sparse
Fewer than 1% of 577 entry-page captures we have measured scored lower.
Walk 24 links seen, 20 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.
Measured by Roentgen 1.18 on 2026-08-03. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.
Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 5 that apply to a content funnel. Per device: desktop 0 · mobile 0.
this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionsee their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionthe entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionShunShi - Free AI BaZi Calculator | Four Pillars Chart Analysis
ShunShi.ai: Free AI BaZi chart analysis with 3 free questions daily. 3,900+ celebrity cases, blind school support. Blending Chinese metaphysics with modern data for personalized destiny insights.
Act in accordance with the times Fulfill one's true nature
What we believe
Start from one birth time, open five perspectives.
Tell us the moment you were born.
Wisdom is not mysticism
Conversation over verdict
Eastern, yet global
BaZi
Zi Wei Dou Shu+3 more, not shown
AI Tools FREE
Workspace →
Sign in
Open BaZi BAZI →
Generate chart — free
applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionAbsence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion4 of 10 measured checks need work
74% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
worst: “01” at 1.96:1 (24px, #b8aa92 on #f4ede0). needs 3:1
FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.
Smallest body text is 10px (base ~16px). below the ~16px readable floor.
FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.
No <main> or <header> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
FixWrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).
27 of 34 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
smallest: “切换语言” at 36×36px
FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.
1 paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.
FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.
type:No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
FixAdd a first-in-DOM <a href="#main"> that is visible on focus.
a11y:7 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
FixDefer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.
weight:palette by on-page usage · type rendered live
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionBody copy in their text role, on a surface card.
Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.
layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionElements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text
What we found — conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each
Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted
We ran these passes on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.
