saas · Aug 9, 2026

debate.tellodb.com

50/100 Thin

Scores above 48% of 1,252 multi-step funnels we have measured. Among the 959 saas funnels in that group, above 37%.

4/11 tactics
4 steps
11 checks
1 flagged

How this was measured

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel.

Measured by Roentgen 1.20.1, one of our versioned rulesets. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Walk 62 links seen, 56 walkable, 4 matched, and we walked 4 pages.

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 4

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest

5 tactics

$1.8 +6 more · subscription

ComparisonTrust badgesFree trialPricing tiersDemo / docs

Features

▼ thinnest

1 tactic

Demo / docs

Use Cases

2 tactics

Free trialDemo / docs

Pricing

4 tactics

$0 +7 more · subscription

ComparisonFree trialPricing tiersDemo / docs

In their own words

33 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: Debate TelloDB — Multi-LLM Review: See Where AI Models Disagree
Meta description: Draft with one AI model, switch models without losing context, and invoke an adversarial multi-model review before consequential work ships.
Headline: Draft with one model. Review with a panel before you ship.
Section headings: Turn the current answer into an adversarial review.Better verdicts start before the debate.Consensus is dangerous when nobody had to disagree.Different mistakes need different attacks. Pick the review your answer has to survive.When they ask how you checked, show the transcript.Trust the record you can inspect, not a confidence claim.The expensive mistake is the one that looked obvious in hindsight.Every token, every dollar, every system prompt. Exposed.+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links: Board memoClient adviceSecurity claimRun the adversarial reviewVIEW DEMOStart free reviewSubscribe to Pro
Prices on the page: $1.8$0.42$0$20$100$0.40$0.80

Sections

4 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Nav section of debate.tellodb.com — **Nav**0% down the page

Hero section of debate.tellodb.com — **Hero**0% down the page

Pricing section of debate.tellodb.com — **Pricing**73% down the page

Footer section of debate.tellodb.com — **Footer**94% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measured

Rating element — **Rating**“round 1 / 5”

What we found

4 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

Offer clarity1 of 1

Makes the pricing ladder explicit free, $0/mo, $20/mo, $100/mo

Action path2 of 4

Offers a free trial or free tier Start free

Offers a demo or docs entry point docs link

Friction reduction1 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier Start free

Value reinforcement1 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives comparison grid: 9 rows

What we didn’t find

7 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see7 of 11 applicable

FAQ / objection handling 1175 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Trusted-by logo wall 1050 of 1369 measured funnels run this

Press / "as seen in" 448 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Lead-capture form 310 of 1256 measured funnels run this

Proof above the fold 292 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Usage / adoption proof 224 of 1369 measured funnels run this

Scarcity / urgency copy 94 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.