saas · Sep 15, 2026

debate.tellodb.com

We found more conversion tactics here than on 67% of the 1,350 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

6 conversion tactics detected

4 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.27.0

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-15. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,781 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 72% of them.

Walk 41 links on the entry page, 32 walkable. 3 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

  1. Proven on the page

    6 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

    Compares itself against alternatives
    comparison grid: 9 rows
    Answers buyer objections
    A few fair questions. How is this different from asking another AI? What can I review? Wha
    Puts proof in the first viewport
    2 Refinement reviews / month

    + 3 more with evidence

    See all 6

  2. Not seen

    5 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

    Trusted-by logo wall
    Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim.
    Press / "as seen in"
    Media logos or an "as seen in / featured in" claim borrowing publication credib…
    Lead-capture form
    An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a che…

    + 2 more

    See what we looked for

  3. Flagged

    2 of 15 build checks flagged, each with a fix

    Body text size
    Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
    Tap-target size (mobile)
    176 of 230 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

    See the fixes

  4. Walked

    4 pages walked, Homepage / Lander to Features

    Step 1
    Homepage / Lander
    Step 2
    Use Cases
    Step 3
    Pricing

    + 1 more step

    Walk it frame by frame

  5. In their words

    The headline: A good answer can take a challenge.

    Promise
    Multi-model AI review for proposals, recommendations and AI answers. Examine the verdict, remaining objection…
    Prices shown
    $85 · $600 · $0

    Read every quote

Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 4

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

4 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest
7 tactics

$85 +4 more

ReviewsFAQTrust badgesFree trialNo cardPricing tiersDemo / docs
Use Cases
02

Use Cases

2 tactics
Free trialDemo / docs
Pricing
03

Pricing

4 tactics

$0 +14 more  ·  subscription

ComparisonFree trialPricing tiersDemo / docs
Features
04

Features

▼ thinnest
2 tactics
Free trialDemo / docs

In their own words

36 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
RigorDesk | A good answer can take a challenge.
Meta description
Multi-model AI review for proposals, recommendations and AI answers. Examine the verdict, remaining objections and full transcript before you act.
Headline
A good answer can take a challenge.
Section headings
Cookies and analyticsShould we hire two SDRs this quarter?From first draft to a considered decision.The useful part is what gets questioned.For the answers you'll have to stand behind.Agreement isn't the same as truth.Read a completed review.What are you thinking through?+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links
Accept analytics cookiesReject analytics cookiesSee what each cookie doesProductStart free ↗Business proposalAI answerTechnical planTwo SDRs will add $600k in pipeline within 90 days.1Hiring is safer than keeping the agency.2+2 more, not shown
Prices on the page
$85$600$0$20$100

Sections

6 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Nav section of debate.tellodb.com
Nav0% down the page
Hero section of debate.tellodb.com
Hero1% down the page
Pricing section of debate.tellodb.com
Pricing73% down the page
FAQ section of debate.tellodb.com
FAQ82% down the page
CTA section of debate.tellodb.com
CTA89% down the page
Footer section of debate.tellodb.com
Footer93% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
No credit card element
No credit card“Two free Refinement reviews each month. No credit card.”

What we found

6 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

objection2 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives comparison grid: 9 rows
Answers buyer objections A few fair questions. How is this different from asking another AI? What can I review? Wha

proof1 of 4

Puts proof in the first viewport 2 Refinement reviews / month

offer2 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier Start free
Makes the pricing ladder explicit free, $0/mo, $20/mo, $100/mo

checkout1 of 2

Offers a demo or docs entry point docs link

What we didn’t find

5 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see5 of 11 applicable

Trusted-by logo wall 1,484 of the 2,043 funnels we checked
Press / "as seen in" 642 of the 2,417 funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 437 of the 1,683 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 289 of the 2,043 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 125 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

15 run · 2 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

2 of 15 measured checks need work

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

176 of 230 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Features” at 60×16px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing6

Line length

13 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

FixStep heading levels one at a time; use CSS for size, not a deeper level.

a11y:heading-levels
Label in name

8 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

FixMake the accessible name start with the visible label text.

a11y:label-in-name
Oversized images

4 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

weight:oversized-images
Keyboard reachability

6 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

FixUse <button>/<a>, or add role + tabindex="0" and a key handler.

structure:keyboard-reachability
Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 4 fields. browsers cannot autofill.

FixAdd autocomplete="email"/"tel"/"name" to identity fields.

forms:autocomplete-hints

Clear7

Text contrast (WCAG AA) · Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Page weight · Render-blocking resources · Inline validation

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
accent#edf0eb
bg#f8f9f6
surface#edf0eb
text#5c665f
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox48px
Jumps over the lazy dog23px
A subheading in their voice19px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
10pxAa
11pxAa
12pxAa
13pxAa
14pxAa
15pxAa
16pxAa
17pxAa
18pxAa
19pxAa
23pxAa
48pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
FAMILIES
Hanken Grotesk
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

1 of 9 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Similar crawls