Homepage / Lander
$39 +1 more · 1 proof point
ecommerce · Sep 9, 2026
Scores higher than 54% of 611 entry-page captures we have measured. Among the 32 ecommerce funnels in that group, higher than 87%.
30/100 Sparse
Walk 3 links seen, 3 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.
Measured by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-09. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.
Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 15 that apply to an ecommerce funnel.
the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionThe Genius Wave™ » (Official Website)
The Genius Wave is a groundbreaking program designed to activate your brain's theta waves and unlock your hidden potential.
The Genius Wave - Official
The Genius Wave™ | Buy Now Only at $39/Bottle Free Bonus & 90-days Money-bank Guarantee
What is The Genius Wave?
How Does The Genius Wave Program Work?
The Genius Wave Reviews
The Science Behind the The Genius Wave Program
Benefits Of The Genius Wave Supplement
90-DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE 100% SATISFACTION GUARANTEED
The Genius Wave FAQs+1 more, not shown
Order Now
GET A DISCOUNT
Buy The Genius Wave
Order The Genius Wave
$39
$499
structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion$499
The Genius Wave Reviews Rated 5 out of 5 “I feel like
The Genius Wave FAQs
90-DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionAbsence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion2 of 10 measured checks need work
89% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
worst: “GET A DISCOUNT” at 1.82:1 (28px, #ffffff on #e6bc00). needs 3:1
FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.
20 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
FixDefer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.
14 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.
type:1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
FixStep heading levels one at a time; use CSS for size, not a deeper level.
a11y:1 image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.
weight:Mobile viewport · Body text size · Language declared · Image alt text · Page weight
palette by on-page usage · type rendered live
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionBody copy in their text role, on a surface card.
Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.
layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty
measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinionPlaybook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted
We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.