Owner view · gl-inet.com

gl-inet.com

Beats 83%.

You beat 83%.

of 200 multi-step e-commerce funnels we’ve measured.

gl-inet.com desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Something wrong?

Scanned 2026-11-04Ecommerce

Below the fold

Section by section.

Each part of the page, with our check beside it.

  1. gl-inet.com Hero section
    Hero · their words: “Fortify (GL-MT6000)”
    Hero · 2% to 13% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 1 button or link, “Shop Now”, 24 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  2. gl-inet.com Content section
    Content · their words: “Mango 2”
    Content · 2% to 13% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 10 words. Absent, not scored 0.

Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.1 on 2026-11-04. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.

Something wrong?

What sets it apart

gl-inet.com does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 200 e-commerce funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Press / "as seen in"

    Rarity

    Only 18%.

    of 200 e-commerce funnels have press / "as seen in". This site is one of them.

    18 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 82 wait outside.

    36 of 200 e-commerce funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    gl-inet.com Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where gl-inet.com does it · Homepage / Lander: “featured in”

    FOUND. Only 18% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. gl-inet.com does. 36 of 200 e-commerce funnels.

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

7 tactics gl-inet.com could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected. A tactic with no peer rate yet is listed without one, never as 0%.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 83%.

of 200 multi-step e-commerce funnels.

beats 83% of 200 multi-step e-commerce funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“GL.iNet - Connecting Beyond Limits”

  • New Releases
  • Travel Routers
  • Home Routers
  • Cellular Routers
  • Remote KVMs
  • IoT Gateways
  • Mini Routers
  • Security Gateways

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 12 pass · 8 need work · 5 notes · 1 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.3×.

Pass

Line length

No sampled paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 494 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (34 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Inline validation

4 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Link text

18 links use generic text (“click here” / “learn more”).

Note

Heading structure

The landing page has no <h1>.

Note

Heading levels

18 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Keyboard reachability

24 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Note

Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 10 fields. browsers cannot autofill.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

90% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 12px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Form labels

3 of 14 form fields have no label.

Needs work

Named controls

13 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Page weight

At least 14.3 MB across 895 measurable resources. 1301 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

Needs work

Render-blocking resources

28 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Needs work

Oversized images

144 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

198 of 304 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

How it looks

Poppins for headlines, Roboto for text. 10 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Press / "as seen in": Only 18% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. gl-inet.com does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

6 of 15 selling tactics found: Press / "as seen in", Proof above the fold, Free shipping, On-page review wall, Anchor / strikethrough pricing, FAQ / objection handling. 9 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 9 it lacks
    • Express walletsOnly 17% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 14% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Money-back guaranteeOnly 13% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof at every stepOnly 12% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 10% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Countdown / urgency timerOnly 7% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Per-unit price anchorOnly 4% of 200 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Stacked free giftsNot found on the pages we x-rayed.
    • Subscription / auto-shipNot found on the pages we x-rayed.

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Press / "as seen in" · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free shipping · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 6 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Press / "as seen in" · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free shipping · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

On-page review wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Anchor / strikethrough pricing · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Express wallets · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Money-back guarantee · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof at every step · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Countdown / urgency timer · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 14

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 10 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 9 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

UXXRAY+

The owner view is for members.

$29/mo. Your rank, your close matches and your fix list, in your own words.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.35.1 on 2026-11-04, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 357 links on the entry page, 311 walkable. 5 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · gl-inet.com · Compare

← Back to the gl-inet.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to gl-inet.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

gl-inet.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.