Measured daily · 230 funnels x-rayed · Facts, not opinions
UXXRAY Start free

← Pattern library

Objection Handling

Us-vs-them comparison

Objection Handling

A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.

Found on 20 of the 230 funnels where it applies (9%).

Funnels running this pattern average 63/100 evidence coverage; those without it average 30/100 (20 vs 210 funnels). Coverage counts how many conversion tactics a funnel runs, so this is co-occurrence across our library, not a promise that adding it raises conversions.

7 verbatim examples · 13 more detected

Each example links to the full teardown.

railway.app section

Compare features

railway.appsaascoverage 68/100Full teardown →
stormly.com section

BEFORE STORMLY Your team is drowning in manual work ✕ Hours building reports that…

stormly.comsaascoverage 60/100Full teardown →
huel.com section

Black Edition Powder Essential Calories 400 cal 400 cal 400

huel.comecommercecoverage 60/100Full teardown →
revise.io section

Revise Grammarly Google Docs MS Word ChatGPT Full Word Proce

revise.iosaascoverage 55/100Full teardown →
ciaotutor.com section

RECOMMENDED CiaoTutor Voice-first coach AI language apps Tal

ciaotutor.comsaascoverage 50/100Full teardown →
figma.com section

Compare all features

figma.comsaascoverage 45/100Full teardown →
fromourplace.com section

See how we compare Titanium Interior Stainless Steel Exterio

fromourplace.comecommercecoverage 45/100Full teardown →
supabase.com section

comparison grid: 13 rows, see it live below

supabase.comsaascoverage 95/100Full teardown →
clerk.com section

comparison grid: 51 rows, see it live below

clerk.comsaascoverage 85/100Full teardown →
insightagent.app section

comparison grid: 8 rows, see it live below

insightagent.appsaascoverage 85/100Full teardown →
castreader.com section

comparison grid: 8 rows, see it live below

castreader.comsaascoverage 75/100Full teardown →
wirevoxai.com section

comparison grid: 23 rows, see it live below

wirevoxai.comsaascoverage 70/100Full teardown →
agentprizm.com section

comparison grid: 8 rows, see it live below

agentprizm.comsaascoverage 70/100Full teardown →
recibbi.site section

comparison grid: 14 rows, see it live below

recibbi.sitesaascoverage 65/100Full teardown →
loomal.ai section

comparison grid: 19 rows, see it live below

loomal.aisaascoverage 60/100Full teardown →
naxely.com section

comparison grid: 9 rows, see it live below

naxely.comsaascoverage 60/100Full teardown →
indexmyurl.com section

comparison grid: 7 rows, see it live below

indexmyurl.comsaascoverage 60/100Full teardown →
probed.chat section

comparison grid: 17 rows, see it live below

probed.chatsaascoverage 55/100Full teardown →
formplume.com section

comparison grid: 30 rows, see it live below

formplume.comsaascoverage 50/100Full teardown →
porfilr.com section

comparison grid: 7 rows, see it live below

porfilr.comsaascoverage 50/100Full teardown →
MORE IN OBJECTION HANDLING
FAQ / objection handling
X-ray your own funnel · free

Method: Evidence Coverage Score: deterministic points across 6 universal conversion categories (Offer, Action, Trust, Friction, Value, Risk/Urgency), normalized to /100 for this funnel TYPE. The type. e-commerce, SaaS, lead-gen, affiliate, or content. is classified from measured signals, and only the tactics that apply to that type count toward the denominator, so a SaaS/lead-gen/affiliate funnel is never penalized for missing e-commerce (Shopify) tactics and vice-versa. Each category is capped so no area dominates; every point traces to an on-page evidence string. It measures conversion coverage for the funnel type, not quality. no opinions, no predictions.