This report was measured 48 days ago — past our freshness window.

larksim.com

Beats 12%.

of 205 multi-step e-commerce funnels we’ve measured.

larksim.com desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
Scanned 2026-09-14Ecommerce

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

12 tactics larksim.com could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected. A tactic with no peer rate yet is listed without one, never as 0%.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 12%.

of 205 multi-step e-commerce funnels.

beats 12% of 205 multi-step e-commerce funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“giffgaff 英国实体 SIM 卡购买与充值券”

  • EN
  • chat_bubble

How it’s built

12 UX checks · 4 pass · 3 need work · 4 notes · 1 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

98% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 23% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

3 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Label in name

4 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Show the other 6 checks
Note

Landmark regions

No <header> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Note

Keyboard reachability

2 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

111 of 123 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Form labels

1 of 11 form fields have no label.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 3.4 MB across 127 measurable resources, but 45 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

How it looks

ui-sans-serif for headlines and text. 7 colours measured.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

1 of 15 selling tactic found: FAQ / objection handling. 14 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 14 it lacks
    • Anchor / strikethrough pricing48% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • On-page review wall41% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Free shipping35% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 30% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 20% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Express walletsOnly 17% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Money-back guaranteeOnly 13% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 13% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 11% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof at every stepOnly 11% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Countdown / urgency timerOnly 8% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Per-unit price anchorOnly 4% of 205 e-commerce funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Stacked free giftsNot found on the pages we x-rayed.
    • Subscription / auto-shipNot found on the pages we x-rayed.

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 1 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Anchor / strikethrough pricing · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

On-page review wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Free shipping · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Express wallets · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 2 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 6

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 7 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-14, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 67 links on the entry page, 20 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · larksim.com · Compare

← Back to the larksim.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to larksim.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

larksim.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.